<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mainsprings for American 8 Day Clocks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clockinfo.com/posts/3/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clockinfo.com/posts/3</link>
	<description>Commentary about clock repair and clock history from Bill's Clockworks and ClockHistory.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:22:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bonnie</title>
		<link>http://clockinfo.com/posts/3/comment-page-1#comment-95462</link>
		<dc:creator>Bonnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 18:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clockinfo.com/2007/06/12/clock-mainsprings/#comment-95462</guid>
		<description>While dis-assembling a waterbury kitchen clock movement, I was talking to my husband and not paying attention, end result is I have two different sized main springs, and don&#039;t know which went to what side.one is heavier, can I assume this went to the strike side safely? I know, lesson learned! Thanks for any help</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While dis-assembling a waterbury kitchen clock movement, I was talking to my husband and not paying attention, end result is I have two different sized main springs, and don&#8217;t know which went to what side.one is heavier, can I assume this went to the strike side safely? I know, lesson learned! Thanks for any help</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Blaser</title>
		<link>http://clockinfo.com/posts/3/comment-page-1#comment-46666</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Blaser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 21:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clockinfo.com/2007/06/12/clock-mainsprings/#comment-46666</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s in a barrel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s in a barrel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Blaser</title>
		<link>http://clockinfo.com/posts/3/comment-page-1#comment-46664</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Blaser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 21:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clockinfo.com/2007/06/12/clock-mainsprings/#comment-46664</guid>
		<description>I have a mantel self-Thomas clock. The 8 day main spring broke.  It’s in a brass chamber with gears on the bottom part.  It has a number #20 at the top.
On the time piece it says.”Made in West Germany for Self-Thomas”…. How can I get this main spring?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a mantel self-Thomas clock. The 8 day main spring broke.  It’s in a brass chamber with gears on the bottom part.  It has a number #20 at the top.<br />
On the time piece it says.”Made in West Germany for Self-Thomas”…. How can I get this main spring?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClockInfo.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ansonia Walnut Kitchen Clock &#8211; Older, 5 Pillar Movement</title>
		<link>http://clockinfo.com/posts/3/comment-page-1#comment-7857</link>
		<dc:creator>ClockInfo.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ansonia Walnut Kitchen Clock &#8211; Older, 5 Pillar Movement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 01:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clockinfo.com/2007/06/12/clock-mainsprings/#comment-7857</guid>
		<description>[...] I recently overhauled this Ansonia walnut cased kitchen clock. The strong time mainspring of 0.018 inch thick, was causing wear to the mainwheel teeth, so I replaced the mainspring with a new one that is only 0.0155 inch thick (Merritt&#8217;s P-1496 in the orange and red box). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I recently overhauled this Ansonia walnut cased kitchen clock. The strong time mainspring of 0.018 inch thick, was causing wear to the mainwheel teeth, so I replaced the mainspring with a new one that is only 0.0155 inch thick (Merritt&#8217;s P-1496 in the orange and red box). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://clockinfo.com/posts/3/comment-page-1#comment-730</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clockinfo.com/2007/06/12/clock-mainsprings/#comment-730</guid>
		<description>Hi Dan,

First, don&#039;t use the 0.18 inch thick mainspring - it is too strong and will cause mainwheel tooth wear. Use 0.0165 inch thick springs as discussed in the postings in this topic. Suppliers are given there, also see the &quot;Clock Parts Links&quot; in the right sidebar for clock parts suppliers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dan,</p>
<p>First, don&#8217;t use the 0.18 inch thick mainspring &#8211; it is too strong and will cause mainwheel tooth wear. Use 0.0165 inch thick springs as discussed in the postings in this topic. Suppliers are given there, also see the &#8220;Clock Parts Links&#8221; in the right sidebar for clock parts suppliers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://clockinfo.com/posts/3/comment-page-1#comment-729</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clockinfo.com/2007/06/12/clock-mainsprings/#comment-729</guid>
		<description>Hello, Bill.

I am looking for a &quot;mainsprings for wall clocks - for 8 days - loop end - size: 3/4&quot; x 0.18&quot; x 96&quot;. Do you have it?

Regards,
Daniel Rocha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, Bill.</p>
<p>I am looking for a &#8220;mainsprings for wall clocks &#8211; for 8 days &#8211; loop end &#8211; size: 3/4&#8243; x 0.18&#8243; x 96&#8243;. Do you have it?</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Daniel Rocha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://clockinfo.com/posts/3/comment-page-1#comment-620</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 04:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clockinfo.com/2007/06/12/clock-mainsprings/#comment-620</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the reply.  This is indeed the quarter strike movement.  Both springs appear to be the same length.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the reply.  This is indeed the quarter strike movement.  Both springs appear to be the same length.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Admin</title>
		<link>http://clockinfo.com/posts/3/comment-page-1#comment-619</link>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 23:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clockinfo.com/2007/06/12/clock-mainsprings/#comment-619</guid>
		<description>Hi Dave,

The original mainspring for most No. 89 movements are 108&quot; long. The 89L movement might have had a longer strike spring, if this is the quarter strike movement. You did the correct thing by keeping the longer thinner springs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave,</p>
<p>The original mainspring for most No. 89 movements are 108&#8243; long. The 89L movement might have had a longer strike spring, if this is the quarter strike movement. You did the correct thing by keeping the longer thinner springs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://clockinfo.com/posts/3/comment-page-1#comment-616</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 03:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clockinfo.com/2007/06/12/clock-mainsprings/#comment-616</guid>
		<description>Hi Bill,
I was given a pair of Seth Thomas mantel clocks for Christmas from a friend, one working, one not. I disassembled cleaned and reassembled the non-working one (has an 89L movement in it, bim-bam rods) and now it works great.

When I bought the supplies (book, oil, mainspring letdown tool) I also bought a pair of mainsprings just in case.  They were 3/4&quot; x 0.0175&quot; x 96&quot; from Timesavers.

I didn&#039;t use them because the originals (they&#039;re stamped ST on the loop) appeared okay when removed and cleaned.  The originals measured 0.0155&quot; thick though and when coiled next to the replacement, seems to have almost half again the number of turns.

A lot of what I&#039;ve read is that 3/4&quot; x 0.018&quot; x 96&quot; is common for 8 day American clocks but thinner should be used.  What about longer springs?

What do you think I have in this clock?  Did Seth Thomas put longer than 96&quot; springs in their 89 movements?

TIA,
Dave
(just getting into this as a hobby)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bill,<br />
I was given a pair of Seth Thomas mantel clocks for Christmas from a friend, one working, one not. I disassembled cleaned and reassembled the non-working one (has an 89L movement in it, bim-bam rods) and now it works great.</p>
<p>When I bought the supplies (book, oil, mainspring letdown tool) I also bought a pair of mainsprings just in case.  They were 3/4&#8243; x 0.0175&#8243; x 96&#8243; from Timesavers.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t use them because the originals (they&#8217;re stamped ST on the loop) appeared okay when removed and cleaned.  The originals measured 0.0155&#8243; thick though and when coiled next to the replacement, seems to have almost half again the number of turns.</p>
<p>A lot of what I&#8217;ve read is that 3/4&#8243; x 0.018&#8243; x 96&#8243; is common for 8 day American clocks but thinner should be used.  What about longer springs?</p>
<p>What do you think I have in this clock?  Did Seth Thomas put longer than 96&#8243; springs in their 89 movements?</p>
<p>TIA,<br />
Dave<br />
(just getting into this as a hobby)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://clockinfo.com/posts/3/comment-page-1#comment-574</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 22:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clockinfo.com/2007/06/12/clock-mainsprings/#comment-574</guid>
		<description>This springs come From Merritt&#039;s antiques as given in the post above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This springs come From Merritt&#8217;s antiques as given in the post above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

